China Law Answers Answers to the legal questions related to china

February 21, 2006

China meant to poison their own pet food supply, but accidentally poisoned ours?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 3:20 am
china law
scottanthonydavis asked:

They will not report it, but I believe the rabbit hole is deeper than told!

Did you see that in China anyone with large dogs had to get rid of them or they would be collected and killed. It is due to a rabies scare. Only small dogs were aloud to be kept. I don’t think everyone was following the law and they were hiding their pets. I think this poison pet food was their next step to insure reduced pet populations. With their one child policy and discarding of young female fetus’s, would you really count it out?

I think this had something to do with that. Only they didn’t expect it to effect America pet food supplies. I think they meant for those foods to be distributed exclusively in China but someone messed up and put it into the U.S. supplies.

It is just to coincidental. A month ago the Chinese are patrolling the streets for loose pets and forcing people to turn in their neighbors if they saw large dogs. Now all of a sudden there is a link to poisoned pet food.

Possible?

DaCare Legal Recruitment

Powered by WordPress