Will one terrorist give an award to another terrorist…?
.
Will one terrorist give an award to another terrorist…?
.
Thanks to the heavy cost of U.S. tax, regulatory, and environmental policies, and tort laws, that have driven up the cost of domestic production (along with trade policies that favor the movement of U.S. manufacturers to China), the evil communist regime in Beijing now has hundreds of billions of dollars in cash to invest in Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and the Middle East (not to mention buying up plenty of key assets in the United States).
In order to continue its meteoric growth rate and advance its global political-military strategy, China is acquiring access to, and control of, much of the Third World mineral wealth, fishery wealth and sea lanes.
They have plans of driving US forces out of Africa through the use of both conventional and unconventional warfare. In order to fully control all of the African continent’s supply and rule the planet.
What can we do to stop their evil plans?
Most sources say that there are 68 crimes, or “more than 68”, or “around 68”, for which you can be executed under Chinese law. A few of them, such as tax evasion, are sometimes given as examples. I’d like to see the whole list.
Can you help me find a list of all 68 capital crimes in Chinese law?
My parents are paying for our meal at mine and my fiance`s wedding. I want a buffet, because I see no point in spending so much extra for family style. I don’t care if we eat on plastic or china, but they really wanted china…so fine. I truly don’t care. But now they want family style, which is $5 extra per head. (our list is 320) It’s just dinner! how do i get them to see that it doesnt matter how its all done? its going to be fun no matter what! why pay so much extra for such a miniscule portion of the evening? HELP ME
also if you can tell me about some laws that I might need to know that have to be followed before shipping merchandise from china to mexico?
In a letter to Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA), dated June 5, 2007, Michael Kurtz, the Assistant Archivist for Records Services at the United States National Archives confirmed that the Cairo Declaration of Dec. 1, 1943, is neither a treaty nor an executive agreement, and as such does not carry the force of law to authorize any transfer of the territorial sovereignty of the areas of “Formosa and the Pescadores” to China. (Ref: http://www.fapa.org/Archives/press%20release%20061407.htm )
By extrapolation, neither the Potsdam Proclamation of July 26, 1945, nor the Japanese Surrender document of Sept. 2, 1945, which rely heavily on the provisions of the Cairo Declaration, can be considered as solid bases (which carry the force of law) to justify any claim of transfer of the territorial sovereignty of the areas of “Formosa and the Pescadores” to China.
So …. are there any true legal documents which prove that the Chinese exercise sovereignty over Taiwan??
China executes more people than the rest of the world combined. The courts have >99% conviction rate, people on trial are frequently denied due process of law and people who are arrested are frequently tortured (“reeducated”). Groups such as Falun Gong and the people of Tibet are brutalized into submission. China also supports dictators in Africa and the Middle East. And yet the US turns a blind eye to all of this and looks only at the business it can do with China. When is the US going to wake up and get tough on the Chinese government over its human rights record?
I’m sure everyone watched the PBS special about murder in China.
Their laws require butchers to keep knives under lock and key to prevent people from stealing weapons to commit murders.
Please consider the long term effects before you rush to give away the Constitution.
I filed some paperwork with a law firm in LA/CA, but never heard back from them and they don’t answer emails and phone calls about it. Not sure what the status is.
We’re trying to put a supply agreement in place and need to know what chinese law says about what language it needs to be in. I think if it is in english, it is invalid by definition, but I’m not sure. Can someone help me and also site there source as this is somewhat important…thanks so much.
Powered by WordPress