China Law Answers Answers to the legal questions related to china

February 21, 2006

China meant to poison their own pet food supply, but accidentally poisoned ours?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 3:20 am
china law
scottanthonydavis asked:

They will not report it, but I believe the rabbit hole is deeper than told!

Did you see that in China anyone with large dogs had to get rid of them or they would be collected and killed. It is due to a rabies scare. Only small dogs were aloud to be kept. I don’t think everyone was following the law and they were hiding their pets. I think this poison pet food was their next step to insure reduced pet populations. With their one child policy and discarding of young female fetus’s, would you really count it out?

I think this had something to do with that. Only they didn’t expect it to effect America pet food supplies. I think they meant for those foods to be distributed exclusively in China but someone messed up and put it into the U.S. supplies.

It is just to coincidental. A month ago the Chinese are patrolling the streets for loose pets and forcing people to turn in their neighbors if they saw large dogs. Now all of a sudden there is a link to poisoned pet food.

Possible?

DaCare Legal Recruitment

9 Comments »

  1. Sure, it’s possible.

    Comment by Venice Girl — February 22, 2006 @ 6:48 pm

  2. i concur great theory very possible

    Comment by le la — February 25, 2006 @ 5:45 am

  3. No. The Chinese have done some horrible things with their animals, but they have never tried to hide it.

    I try to avoid Chinese goods – hard to do – because of their tendency toward animal cruelty but i think this is simply a matter of a third-world country using a cheap chemical as fertilizer and the US not having good enough food inspection methods to detect contaminated food coming from other countries.

    Sometimes the obvious is exactly what it is.

    Comment by Bozema — February 26, 2006 @ 4:57 pm

  4. Wouldn’t surprise me a bit…these are people who used to sell organs from the cadavers of prisoners. So, pet food poison?? yup, possible.

    Comment by mr_r_bowman — March 1, 2006 @ 3:20 pm

  5. America’s food supply (pet’s or human’s) is very vulnerable. Yes, we take extreme precautions with it, but there are things that slip through. E coli, foot and mouth, or salmanilla for example, there were major outbreaks of these diseases recently that affected a lot of people. All though it isn’t extremely hard to trace the food back to its source there are still weak spots that people can miss or forget something. Yes, they washed the spinach many times, but that had nothing to do with it. It was their contaminated water. The food was already saturated with that water, so no amount of washing was going to get it out. Your theory is very possible. People make mistakes, but there’s nothing you can really do about it after it takes its course.

    Comment by CowgirlUp — March 1, 2006 @ 11:47 pm

  6. I read in an article that china did not know about the poison and their animals are not getting sick.

    Comment by jilly — March 3, 2006 @ 5:19 pm

  7. very possible they sell human organs from political dissidents its not a stretch to poison animals!!

    Comment by Z H — March 6, 2006 @ 8:24 pm

  8. Here is my theory:
    Iams parent company is Procter & Gamble.Procter & Gamble is a huge animal testing company.They test on all types of animals dogs,rabbits,cats,monkeys,RATS,they probably got something they were testing into the supply.

    Comment by vegan&proud — March 9, 2006 @ 8:36 pm

  9. How silly. it’s america that likes to sh1t where they eat, and then do little but try to cover it up. if you were old enough you might remember how they poisoned every dairy cow in america in 1972. did they fix the problem? no.

    more recently (though everyone seems to have forgotten already), it was discovered that organic doesn’t really mean organic when it comes to spinach, and that peanut butter can be deadly. this is a country that makes a practice of “Genetically engineered Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH/BST) in your milk”, of irradiating food products, of genetically engineering food poducts (proving once and for all that looking like a duck does not neccessarily mean it is a duck).

    Comment by Golden — March 12, 2006 @ 7:11 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress