China Law Answers Answers to the legal questions related to china

May 10, 2008

Would you prefer to live in China or US?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 1:31 pm
china law
Lucifer1000 asked:

Totalitarian Country versus Western Democracy

Both countries contain wealthy people.. infact there are bigger real estate tycoons in China than there is in the US.

How about freedom and human rights issues?

Just walking around in the United States you have to careful of someone pulling a gun on you due to your stupid laws.

US dominates China in violence and crime rate. As for pollution US still wins this despite having 1/6th the population of China.

What about life expectancy? well due to your gun laws you would probably get shot before you even reach the age of 50 let alone at 21 years of age.

How about hygiene and health issues? lol… I won’t even go there…

If you don’t want a negative opinion of your country then change your damn gun laws. Citizens are not the infantry and do not need guns.

Don’t vote for any president who won’t force the removal of all guns. .
everyone who posts USA probably has a gun or several guns in their household
ok I’ve heard the spitting in China..

but people just spit in US too? its a foul habit I agree but not as foul as littering and other things
ohh interesting now I know why guns will always be allowed in the US.

So disarming people of weapons is removing their rights to violen.. cough I mean freedom..

No wonder the crime rate is so high there.. and you can’t have a constructive debate without being violent or resorting to name calling.

Vote for a president with a ‘brain’… (this excludes the Clintons)

which leaves either Ron Paul or Obama.

DaCare Legal Recruitment

April 30, 2008

People’s Republic of China?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 5:16 pm
china law
Chairman_Mao asked:

CHINA
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Head of state: Hu Jintao
Head of government: Wen Jiabao
Death penalty: retentionist
International Criminal Court: not ratified

An increased number of lawyers and journalists were harassed, detained, and jailed. Thousands of people who pursued their faith outside officially sanctioned churches were subjected to harassment and many to detention and imprisonment. Thousands of people were sentenced to death or executed. Migrants from rural areas were deprived of basic rights. Severe repression of Uighurs in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region continued, and freedom of expression and religion continued to be severely restricted in Tibet and among Tibetans elsewhere.

International community
Before China’s election to the new UN Human Rights Council, it made a number of human rights-related pledges, including ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and active co-operation with the UN on human rights.
http://thereport.amnesty.org/eng/Regions/Asia-Pacific/China

DaCare Legal Recruitment

China and democracy since 1989?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 7:07 am
china law
cookie asked:

How did China struggle for democracy after Tiananmen Massacre? Has it stepped towards democracy?

What kind of government is China today, communist?
And does it have any of the following features?

•Sovereignty of the people.
•Government based upon consent of the governed.
•Majority rule.
•Minority rights.
•Guarantee of basic human rights.
•Free and fair elections.
•Equality before the law.
•Due process of law.
•Constitutional limits on government.
•Social, economic, and political pluralism.
•Values of tolerance, pragmatism, cooperation, and compromise.

DaCare Legal Recruitment

April 24, 2008

Millions of China’s construction workers exploited, survey finds?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 9:57 am
china law
frankstronoch asked:

BEIJING (AFP) – Millions of men working on construction sites in China’s cities often are not paid on time, not legally employed and suffer other forms of exploitation, according to a survey published Monday.

Some 53 percent of the 5,000 migrant construction workers polled by the China Academy of Social Sciences and Tsinghua University said they did not have a legally mandated labour contract, according to the state-run China Daily newspaper.

Even among those that had signed labour contracts, as all are supposed to by law, 41 percent said they were not given copies of the document and 17 percent said they did not understand its content.

According to the survey, labourers worked an average of 10 hours a day, 27 days a month, but only 31 percent of the workers said that they were regularly paid on time.

Note: By the way, this is ok…what is not ok is Japan hasn’t apologize for the actions in WW2.

DaCare Legal Recruitment

April 20, 2008

Wont Obama need at least 3 terms as President to get all thru he has promised?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 1:55 am
china law
Shamir asked:

I dont see how he is going to get that thru Congress and into some kind of Laws all the things he is promising. Including that new Tariff on Chinese goods, that would have to be a change of law involving an agreed trade between US and China

Is it possible that Obama is promising us too much he cannot deliver in the allotted time as President if he should win.??

DaCare Legal Recruitment

China, EU or USA – which pan-continental political structure is nicer to people?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 1:44 am
china law
beyond asked:

Which system most naturally favours the freedom, health and welfare of the many? A great big state, an international open market, or a great big state made of smaller states.
Is it a matter of law, or is the will of the less wealthy facilitated by certain types of political structure?

DaCare Legal Recruitment

April 18, 2008

Can we Adopt a child if my husband had a criminal record?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 6:39 pm
china law
I ♥ Richard KHC asked:

He got in a fight with someone it was self defense but there is no self defense law where I live in the US. He has a few minor charges too that were thrown in because they like to charge you with as much bull as possible. are there any countrys that overlook criminal records? or are we just plain screwed. I seen that china goes on a case by case basis, I have hopes for that.

DaCare Legal Recruitment

April 11, 2008

Is it time to boycott China?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 8:15 am
china law
pep asked:

China has proven time and time again that this country does not have animal rights. They use dog and cat fur to trim jackets
, they skin animals alive after beating them with clubs or stomping on them, and now they used poison, melamine, as protein filler in our loved-ones food. 17 pets have died….and over 4,000 farm-raised animals have also passed. What will it take for this country to reform, make laws respecting animals, and show some humanity? I have already started my boycott. I will not buy anything made in China. The Olympics are coming up next year. I will also boycott watching them as they take place in China. This country, and it’s lack of legislation for animal protection, enfuriates me. What are your thoughts?
Rockhuller114, I don’t even live in the USA. Stop judging me!

DaCare Legal Recruitment

April 4, 2008

I have to write a 10pg paper on something international conflicty. Any good ideas?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 3:29 am
china law
Claire asked:

1) Obvious things like Israel-Palestine, China-Taiwan, Sudan, I can’t do b/c people already have them.
I was thinking something like Sri Lankan civil war, censorship in China and how it compares to the rest of the world, or maybe the way secular governments allow/disallow religious ‘violations’ of law (what’s that called?). But I’m not that up to date on the news so I can’t come up with many ideas.

DaCare Legal Recruitment

March 29, 2008

Should the attorney general be put to the curb?

Filed under: China Law — Tags: , , — china @ 9:43 pm
china law
texastiger7 asked:

I wrote a very long and what I hope to be articulate letter to Hillary today about this subject in response to a mass email on the subject. I think this administration has been slowly eroding the rule of law. Replacing competent and successful US attorneys with partisan automatons is a power grab.
Especially when they are encourage to “find”reasons to single out democrats. That is a tactic use din Russia or China. That is not what the rule of law is about,everyone is equal before the law no exceptions.
This I realize does not happen all the time, but any deliberate action to undermine this idea should be dealt with quickly. I think the concept of the rule of law is the most important facet to a representative democracy. Without it we just have tyranny with a fancy name,and tyrants who are elected. Saddam was elected so is hugo chavez.

DaCare Legal Recruitment

« Newer Posts — Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress